• Viewing all posts tagged "my high horse"

  • TIME Must Have an Intern

    TIME Magazine Onlie posts a decent article covering the guys beind You Suck at Photoshop, which was hilarious and viral about… oh… a year ago.  Their Webby nomination seems to have brought some more mainstream attention.  I must admit, I didn’t realize a comedy duo was behind it, and that those guys later created MyDamnChannel.com.  Not that I care.

  • [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
    Unknown
    Unknown
    4
    plays

    Obituary of Utah Phillips, read by Steve Baker, Program Director of KVMR Radio in Nevada City, hosted on A Short Jog Through a Long Memory.

    The nation has lost a hero.

    A passage of his I quote frequently, performed on The Past Didn’t Go Anywhere:


    I learned in Korea that I would never again in my life abdicate to somebody else my right and my ability to decide who the enemy is. …

    I’d heard that there was a house in Salt Lake City by the roper yards… where there was a clothing barrel and free food.  So I, I got off the train there.  I was headed for Salt Lake anyway.

    I found that house right where they said it was, but most of all I found this, this wiry old man, sixty-nine years old. Tougher’n nails, heart of gold, fella by the name of Ammon Hennessy.  Anybody know that name?  Ammon Hennessy?  One of Dorothy Day’s people, the Catholic workers, during the Thirties they started houses of hospitality all over the country; there’re about eighty of ‘em now.

    Ammon Hennessy was one of those; he’d come west to start this house I’d found called The Joe Hill House of Hospitality.  Ammon Hennessy was a Catholic anarchist, pacifist, draft-dodger of two World Wars, tax refuser, vegetarian, one-man revolution in America - I think that about covers it.

    First thing he said, after he got to know me, he said: “You know you love the country.  You love it.  You come in and out of town on those trains singin’ songs about different places and beautiful people.  You know you love the country; you just can’t stand the government.  Get it straight.”  He quoted Mark Twain to me: “Loyalty to the country always; loyalty to the government when it deserves it.“  It was an essential distinction I had been neglecting.

    And then he had to reach out and grapple with the violence, but he did that with all the people around him.  These second World War vets, you know, on medical disabilities and all drunked up; the house was filled with violence, which Ammon, as a pacifist, dealt with - every moment, every day of his life. He said, “You got to be a pacifist.“  I said, “Why?“  He said, “It’ll save your life.“  And my behavior was very violent then.

    I said, “What is it?”  And he said, “Well I can’t give you a book by Gandhi - you wouldn’t understand it.  I can’t give you a list of rules that if you sign it you’re a pacifist.”  He said, “You look at it like booze.  You know, alcoholism will kill somebody, until they finally get the courage to sit in a circle of people like that and put their hand up in the air and say, ‘Hi, my name’s Utah, I’m an alcoholic.’  And then you can begin to deal with the behavior, you see, and have the people define it for you whose lives you’ve destroyed.”

    He said, “It’s the same with violence.  You know, an alcoholic, they can be dry for twenty years; they’re never gonna sit in that circle and put their hand up and say, ‘Well, I’m not alcoholic anymore’ - no, they’re still gonna put their hand up and say, ‘Hi, my name’s Utah, I’m an alcoholic.’  It’s the same with violence.  You gotta be able to put your hand in the air and acknowledge your capacity for violence, and then deal with the behavior, and have the people whose lives you messed with define that behavior for you, you see.  And it’s not gonna go away - you’re gonna be dealing with it every moment in every situation for the rest of your life.”

    I said, “Okay, I’ll try that,” and Ammon said “It’s not enough!”

    I said: “Oh.”

    He said, “You were born a white man in mid-twentieth century industrial America.  You came into the world armed to the teeth with an arsenal of weapons.  The weapons of privilege, racial privilege, sexual privilege, economic privilege.  You wanna be a pacifist, it’s not just giving up guns and knives and clubs and fists and angry words, but giving up the weapons of privilege, and going into the world completely disarmed.  Try that.”

    That old man has been gone now twenty years, and I’m still at it.  But I figure if there’s a worthwhile struggle in my own life, that, that’s probably the one. Think about it.

    I’d always wanted to write a song for that old man.  He never wanted one about him - he’s that way - but something mulched up out of his thought, his anarchist thought.  Anarchist in the best sense of the word.  Oh so many times he stood up in front of Federal District Judge Ritter, that old fart, and he’d  be picked up for picketing illegally, and he never plead innocent or guilty -  he plead anarchy.

    And Ritter’d say, “What’s an anarchist, Hennessy?” and Ammon would say, “Why an anarchist is anybody who doesn’t need a cop to tell him what to do.“  Kind of a fundamentalist anarchist, huh?

    And Ritter’d say, “But Ammon, you broke the law, what about that?” and Ammon’d say, “Oh, Judge, your damn laws the good people don’t need ‘em and the bad  people don’t obey ‘em so what use are they?”

    Well I lived there for eight years, and I watched him, really watched him, and I discovered watching him that anarchy is not a noun, but an adjective.  It  describes the tension between moral autonomy and political authority,  especially in the area of combinations, whether they’re going to be voluntary  or coercive.  The most destructive, coercive combinations are arrived at through force.

    Like Ammon said, “Force is the weapon of the weak.”

  • Bear Sterns Managers Indicted

    This is ridiculous.

    It’s not that these guys probably aren’t guilty of something, but scapegoating a few tools at the end of the line will not put people back in their homes. I expect to see hundreds of arrests all along the CMO line - from those who pitched the mortgages to those who couldn’t afford them to those who incetivized the sales people to do so… from the banks that intentionally obfuscated the securitization risk to the hedge funds that snapped them up and traded them internationally.  Everyone is at fault here, and some people saw it coming… back in 2003… and I don’t just mean that SubPrime Primer slideshow.  I can say no more.

    A friend of mine here at work used to work under these dudes and says that they were nice enough, for what it’s worth.

  • If a service launches based on another service that's always broken, does it make a sound?

    A message came across my Twitter feed this morning, posted via TwitterFone.  This service allows you to call a local number from your cell phone and record a short message, which is then auto-transcribed into text and posted to your Twitter feed.  Don’t get too excited, it’s invitation only right now.  (Here’s a sample message)

    As a million and one different twitter-based services pop up, Darwinian forces will pull some into mass circulation as others become relics you can eventually laugh at your friends for inviting you to join.  So far twitpic and twitterberry seem to fill acutal niches (autoposting photos and twitter access from your BlackBerry, respectively) and - all knowledge gathered via my own anecdotal spidersense - these seem like they’re here to stay.  Tweets sent from desktop apps like Twitteriffic also seem to have some fans, but most standalone software appeals to the more niche market of those that want to cross post items from another RSS feed (twitterfeed) or Pownce (Twhirl).  Like any evolutionary process, my guess is that the more specific the software, the more likely it is to die out as the environment changes.

    We all recognize the uses for Twitter itself - for entertainment, microblogging, networking, pushing information, etc etc etc… - but we have also all encountered that damn whale (apparently a stock photo) and vast spans of downtime.  So how can any service, especially one that relies on a technology as imperfect as voice recognition and gives up the super-fast, super-discreet traits of its parent, expect to develop a large and loyal userbase?  Getting a tweet to post in its entirety is important to many people; do you know when you’ve spoken 140 characters?  It’s like multiplying fractions…. if Twitter is up 95% of the time (random generous number) and you send 10% of your tweets as voice messages, and 50% of those are translated correctly, and half of those have enough in the first 140 characters to generate a click-thru… does it really matter?  If you usually attempt to tweet a message every 30 minutes you’re awake (let’s say 18 hours), that still works out to .855 successful TwitterFone tweets a day - in otherwords, maybe a single tweet hits its target.  Is that enough to perpetuate its existence?

    If you have an opinion, tweet it out.

  • This is what I do when I’m waiting for emails to roll in - click image for larger version.

It seems like lately everywhere I look, someone is talking about their great muxtape.  If you’re not familiar, muxtape is a site that lets you upload 12 mp3s at a time, a la the classic, tradeable “mixtape.”  Others can listen to your set and buy the individual tracks off amazon if they like it.  All in all, a pretty cool system and a great way to get non-crap music streaming at work.  BUT - Exactly how pervasive is this new, hipster hit?
As I was browsing for playlists that struck my fancy, it seemed like the same users were popping up over and over again.  I decided that either (1) they have some sneaky weighting algorithm that places some users on the front page more often or (2) there’s just not that many people with active accounts yet.   Since Ariel Waldman’s username popped up within my first three refreshes, I was leaning towards the former.
Enter Excel and some serious geeking out.
By copy/pasting and refreshing the users a few times, I pulled a few trials of 1000 users at a time and did a little analysis on the results. (Don’t worry about my sanity - this only took about 30 minutes of office downtime.)  Well surprise, surprise, it looks like BOTH are true!
Although I didn’t do a HUGE sample set as my time involved matched my level of caring here, I still didn’t expect to see some users show up over 13 times.  In fact, some showed up 23 times!  For those of you keeping track at home, that’s well beyond the eighth standard deviation (in otherwords, HIGHLY unlikely to occur as a random event). Upon inspection though, I didn’t actually recognize any of those most recurrent names (except for gawker), so maybe it really is just due to small sample size. After all, Ariel Waldman didn’t show up once in 15,000 names.  :P
As for user base size, the multiple trials of decreasing uniqueness create the two asymptotes in the graph above.  I added a line of best fit which happens to be a parabola, but no mind as its tangent still approximates the limit.  In other words, as of this writing they probably have somewhere around 7,500 users, give or take a few hundred (err on the higher side).  Thats a pretty small group of people, but as usual, the first adopters are the noisiest on the net, so they’re squaking hard about this one.  I, for one, love the idea.  In fact, why not listen to my muxtape riiiiiight…. now?
Any statisticians in the crowd want to comment?

    This is what I do when I’m waiting for emails to roll in - click image for larger version.

    It seems like lately everywhere I look, someone is talking about their great muxtape. If you’re not familiar, muxtape is a site that lets you upload 12 mp3s at a time, a la the classic, tradeable “mixtape.” Others can listen to your set and buy the individual tracks off amazon if they like it. All in all, a pretty cool system and a great way to get non-crap music streaming at work. BUT - Exactly how pervasive is this new, hipster hit?

    As I was browsing for playlists that struck my fancy, it seemed like the same users were popping up over and over again. I decided that either (1) they have some sneaky weighting algorithm that places some users on the front page more often or (2) there’s just not that many people with active accounts yet. Since Ariel Waldman’s username popped up within my first three refreshes, I was leaning towards the former.

    Enter Excel and some serious geeking out.

    By copy/pasting and refreshing the users a few times, I pulled a few trials of 1000 users at a time and did a little analysis on the results. (Don’t worry about my sanity - this only took about 30 minutes of office downtime.) Well surprise, surprise, it looks like BOTH are true!

    Although I didn’t do a HUGE sample set as my time involved matched my level of caring here, I still didn’t expect to see some users show up over 13 times. In fact, some showed up 23 times! For those of you keeping track at home, that’s well beyond the eighth standard deviation (in otherwords, HIGHLY unlikely to occur as a random event). Upon inspection though, I didn’t actually recognize any of those most recurrent names (except for gawker), so maybe it really is just due to small sample size. After all, Ariel Waldman didn’t show up once in 15,000 names.  :P

    As for user base size, the multiple trials of decreasing uniqueness create the two asymptotes in the graph above.  I added a line of best fit which happens to be a parabola, but no mind as its tangent still approximates the limit.  In other words, as of this writing they probably have somewhere around 7,500 users, give or take a few hundred (err on the higher side).  Thats a pretty small group of people, but as usual, the first adopters are the noisiest on the net, so they’re squaking hard about this one.  I, for one, love the idea.  In fact, why not listen to my muxtape riiiiiight…. now?

    Any statisticians in the crowd want to comment?

  • The Embarrassment of Crowds

    Last.fm tracks the songs you listen to and lets others browse your playlists, favorites, etc.  While the thought process  should be (insert your own madlib words where indicated) “Oh, I listen to [Styrofoam], too, [jonathanyoungblood], what is this other music you have that I have not heard of?  I like it!” … the reality can be more like “Oh, I used to listen to [Fischerspooner], too, [Ariel Waldman]*, like four years ago.  And how did those three repeat plays of [Paris Hilton]’s [Stars are Blind] sneak into your playlist?  Rough night??”

    So people delete things that make them seem not quite as hip as they would like.  Enter this page, which aggregates the most deleted tracks and artists.  Not surprisingly, Britney Spears’ Piece of Me takes top honors, but The Beatles and Radiohead?  Can’t we all just admit that it’s ok to like something, even though other people like it too?  And that yes, their second album might, in fact, be better?

    *Please note that Ms Waldman’s last.fm profile is empty.  I just like to use her as an example as often as possible because (1) she has a profile everywhere which I frequently stumble across and (2) she was totally rude to my husband during a pownce customer service dispute.  The Fisherspooner reference actually refers to her current muxtape.

  • Making Me Vomit: A Marketing Duel

    And the winner is …. horrifying Dell ad!  ::and the crowd goes wild::

    I expect this kind of crap from Dior, but the concept that tech gadgets are not interesting to girls unless they are pink and covered in rhinestones is gag inducing.  Bonus points for all the details on the locker adorning post-its (click image for large size) like “Call Leah,” “Mall with mom,” “English Test” (not math, obvs), and “I <3 ____.”  And don’t forget, Girlz Rule!

  • (via topherchris)
Being that 95% of everything I buy comes from the internet, I&#8217;ve never gone out to do battle with the insane shoppers of Black Friday. Observing from afar, the whole concept has always just seemed really, really weird.

    (via topherchris)

    Being that 95% of everything I buy comes from the internet, I’ve never gone out to do battle with the insane shoppers of Black Friday. Observing from afar, the whole concept has always just seemed really, really weird.

  • woodswoodswoods:

    adamfrucci:

    Parody ad for 92YTribeca, written and directed by Michael Showalter and starring like 50 hilarious people.

    BEST. Any Mirman is good Mirman.

    Most of the time, I feel like I’m isolated in my myopic obsession turned hatred of like … stuff. Then I see the internet, and am consoled.

  • New $28k/year School for the Gifted in Manhattan helps take overflow from public gifted programs

    Last year, 14,822 4-year-olds tested for admission to the city’s gifted kindergarten programs, up from 12,410 the year before. About 1 in 5 (3,231) scored in the 90th percentile or higher, qualifying them for neighborhood-based gifted programs, and 9 percent (1,345) made the 97th percentile cutoff for the three citywide gifted programs in Manhattan and two new ones in Brooklyn and Queens.

    What’s wrong with this picture?

  • The New Yorker: Should you eat meat?

    (via marco)

    As usual, the article defers the question of should for an description of why any thinking person wouldn’t.

    At any rate…. I really just wanted an excuse to link Neal Stephenson’s book Zodiac, which will absolutely put you off eating sea life forever. Just thinking about it still makes me queasy.

  • DNA Test Finds Plenty of Sushi Misidentified and Endangered

    (via Gothamist)

    Nineteen of 31 restaurants erroneously described or failed to identify the sushi they sold. Twenty-two of 68 samples were sold as species that were contradicted by molecular identification. …Two out of the four restaurants were found to be serving cheap tilapia passed off as expensive white tuna, and six out of ten grocery stores had fake fish.

    And I eat so much sushi. Well, this just deepens my resolve to give it up, come New Year’s. (Ack, 31 days…. someone get me a rainbow roll, stat!)